<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Stocks &#187; Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electionstocks.com/category/defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electionstocks.com</link>
	<description>Analyzing the impact of the Obama Administration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cyber Security</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/31/cyber-security/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/31/cyber-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNBC had a segment yesterday covering one aspect of terrorism that is not commonly recognized: cyberterrorism. In the process, they touched on some of the issues in our previous post regarding the most recent terror attack on the United States.


]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/31/cyber-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Terror</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/29/trading-terror/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/29/trading-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress and the Obama Administration are considering new policies in the aftermath of the recent terror attempt on a NorthWest flight to Detroit.
In the first place, the stock of major airlines has taken a predictable hit, and ought to trend low for some time. Many airlines are private companies, but publicly traded corporations include Continental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/12/29/trading-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backdown on Missile Plan Hurts Defense Stocks</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/09/17/backdown-on-missile-plan-hurts-defense-stocks/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/09/17/backdown-on-missile-plan-hurts-defense-stocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The First Year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/09/17/backdown-on-missile-plan-hurts-defense-stocks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials at the Pentagon unanimously agreed today that they would drop the elaborate plan to build a missile defense system in Eastern Europe. Naturally, this was met with much criticism &#8211; but regardless of the new plan&#8217;s merits from a security standpoint, this has a profound impact on the defense sector.
Unfortunately, this impact is quite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/09/17/backdown-on-missile-plan-hurts-defense-stocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast Money Poll on Obama</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/28/fast-money-poll-on-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/28/fast-money-poll-on-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The First Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/28/fast-money-poll-on-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNBC&#8217;s Fast Money &#8220;Trade School Poll&#8221; today asks what the best sector is to trade into for the rest of Obama&#8217;s presidency. They list banks, clean energy, infrastructure, and healthcare as their four answers. 
Noticeably absent is the defense sector. Considering Obama&#8217;s commitment of more troops to Afghanistan, gradual timetable out of Iraq, and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/28/fast-money-poll-on-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Portfolios</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/23/obama-portfolio-on-dealbreaker/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/23/obama-portfolio-on-dealbreaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/23/obama-portfolio-on-dealbreaker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently discovered that Dealbreaker.com has been keeping track of its very own Obama portfolio for some time now. We also learned that Teeka Tiwari has been keeping a couple blogs on Obama / McCain stocks. Neither of these portfolios have done very well though; Tiwari&#8217;s has a -14% spread against his McCain picks.
Meanwhile, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/23/obama-portfolio-on-dealbreaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Touch of Irony</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-touch-of-irony/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-touch-of-irony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distracting Non-Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-touch-of-irony/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Typically here on Election Stocks, we make decisions on how stocks are likely due to behave based on Barack Obama&#8217;s policies in office. What&#8217;s interesting about this post is that it has nothing to do with any real policy being proposed by this administration &#8211; rather a growing sentiment among many suspicious right wingers.
We are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-touch-of-irony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-Up On Defense</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/06/follow-up-on-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/06/follow-up-on-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/06/follow-up-on-defense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Defense Secretary Gates announced his changing priorities for how the $534 billion defense budget should be spent.
50% of the money in the budget should go to programs meant to counter conventional threats, about 10% to programs useful only in irregular war and 40% to programs that are useful to both.
In other words, the Pentagon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/04/06/follow-up-on-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issues With Defense</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/03/26/issues-with-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/03/26/issues-with-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/03/26/issues-with-defense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s budget plans call for what appears to be a 4% increase in the spending money for defense. We at Election Stocks have been quite sure in the past that Obama would be continuing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for some time, thereby keeping the defense sector relatively stable.
However, many liberals in legislature want [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/03/26/issues-with-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stimulus Package Extravaganza</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/02/14/stimulus-package-extravaganza/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/02/14/stimulus-package-extravaganza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The First Year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/02/14/stimulus-package-extravaganza/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that the stimulus package is going to be the big spending bill of the year, making it the &#8216;pork barrel&#8217; &#8211; so to speak. The fact that there is going to be quite limited appropriations of cash for the rest of 09, this does a lot for us in determining the timing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/02/14/stimulus-package-extravaganza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Things Obama Can Do Now</title>
		<link>http://electionstocks.com/2009/01/26/ten-things-obama-can-do-now/</link>
		<comments>http://electionstocks.com/2009/01/26/ten-things-obama-can-do-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy_in_a_Suit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Autos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cell Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/2009/01/26/ten-things-obama-can-do-now/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forbes had a characteristically thoughtful piece last week naming ten things Obama could accomplish with an executive order that would help the market out. Our energy policy is one thing the Bush administration worked hard to influence; Obama could choose to regulate our alternative and standard energy sources. A few specific sectors the author specifically [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://electionstocks.com/2009/01/26/ten-things-obama-can-do-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
